The recent media coverage of Vice President Sara Duterte, especially concerning her use of confidential funds, has raised questions about journalistic integrity. Various news outlets have scrutinized her actions, particularly her refusal to take an oath during a congressional hearing and allegations of mishandling public funds.
In some cases, Duterte has accused the inquiry of being a politically motivated attack, with the media amplifying this narrative. This has led to tensions between her office and opposition lawmakers, who continue to question the legality and transparency of her actions regarding the use of confidential funds. Some media outlets have reported on both sides, highlighting the lack of a clear explanation from Duterte and the concerns raised by opposition figures.
While the media has brought transparency to the issue by reporting on the House hearings and the ongoing controversy, Duterte's supporters argue that some of this coverage may be politically biased. On the other hand, the need for accountability and public scrutiny of government officials' actions is a fundamental principle of journalistic integrity.
Ultimately, whether the media is fully maintaining journalistic integrity may depend on how balanced their coverage is and how well they present both Duterte’s defenses and the accusations against her.
